Contact

David Rabenau

314.246.9808

Email

Credentials

David Rabenau is a Certified Missouri Home Energy Auditor

LEED AP logo
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED® AP).
BPI Logo
BPI Certified Professional:
Building Analyst
Envelope

RESNET Rater Seal of Quality
Energy and Environmental Ratings Alliance
Certified HERS Rater

Common Misconceptions: Window BS

July 21st, 2010 by David Rabenau

Window Building Science or just plain window BS? You decide. A lot of home energy auditors feel that windows are over-sold, meaning that the typical window salesman exaggerates the benefits of new windows. Let’s run some numbers and you can decide, because in truth, like most things in building science, it all depends on the specifics.

For our example, we are going to use a 36” x 60” window, or 15 square feet. We’re also going to assume that our example home has an 80 AFUE natural gas furnace, meaning roughly that it runs at 80% efficiency. The home also has an air conditioning unit for cooling with an efficiency of 13 SEER, the federal minimum standard. The 80 AFUE furnace is probably about average and the 13 SEER A/C is probably a little better than most installed units. (Those homeowners in rural areas who have electric heat are going to have heating savings substantially higher than what we calculate below.) Further, we’re going to pretend this house is in St. Louis, Missouri (so it has 4900 HDD and 1527 CDD). So now we’re ready to go.

Let’s say we have an old single glazed wood frame window and we purchase a brand new ENERGY STAR replacement window for it. Uninstalled we could expect to pay about $109 for the new window. Remember, that’s uninstalled. Given the assumptions we made above, we can expect to save about $9.92 in heating costs and about $16.36 in cooling costs annually. In other words, that may not be a bad investment, especially if the windows are leaky and the installation cost wasn’t too exorbitant. By “leaky” here I mean air leakage since if they leaked water they’d probably have been replaced long ago – or should have been.

But most of us don’t have old single glazing type windows alone. They probably had storm windows added to them a long time ago, and that presents a completely different scenario. Replacing a single glazed window that has a storm window with a new ENERGY STAR replacement window (same price), we might expect to save only $3.14 in heating costs and $5.18 in cooling costs annually. It’s going to take some time then to pay off that new window. Now, if this is the meager savings I get with a single glazed window with a storm, you can pretty much assume that if you have an old double-glazed window which a window salesman is trying to get you to replace, that your savings wouldn’t be any better.

Ok, ok – let’s say we did have an old single glazed window without a storm. It would cost us about $46.00 to purchase a storm window for it (uninstalled again). Once installed we could expect it to save us $6.78 in heating costs and $11.18 in cooling costs annually. Wow! But, true, there is the hassle of putting them up and taking them down each year if you are so inclined to do so.

So that’s window building science in a nutshell. Given the savings above, it’s probably better to spend the window money for energy efficiency upgrades elsewhere in the home. But not always. There are some situations where new windows is a very good investment.

And finally, for those of you engineering types who just can’t put your pencils down, I’m using $1 for the cost of a natural gas therm and $0.086 for the cost of kWh (read this and weep, Californians). The U-values used for the window examples above are:

.9 – Single glazed wood frame

.3 – ENERGY STAR qualified window

.49 – Single glazed with storm window

That should be all you need to check my calculations.

Common Misconceptions: How Big Is Your A/C?

July 7th, 2010 by David Rabenau

I remember getting a haircut once when I was a boy and how the barber bragged and bragged at how big his rooftop air conditioner was. It was long ago, and so I don’t remember much other than that – only the blast of cold air streaming out of the supply register. He probably told everyone how many tons it was. Believe it or not, I do seem to remember it cycling on and off a lot.

The lesson today: don’t listen to your barber when getting an air conditioner. Bigger (than needed) is not better. It’s actually worse, and here’s why.

Air conditioning cooling has two components. It removes both sensible heat – that is, the air temperature, the heat you measure with a thermometer – and it removes latent heat. Latent heat is the heat energy stored in the air’s water vapor. We all know it takes heat to create steam. But once vaporized, that heat doesn’t just disappear, it is held by the water vapor in the air. In fact, in places like St. Louis (where “St.” stands for “Steamy”) a big part of what an air conditioner does is remove that humidity. If an air conditioner is sized too big, it cools the sensible heat down fairly quickly. The thermostat then switches off, but more times than not, it didn’t remove much moisture from the air because not enough air circulated through the duct work and over the air conditioning coils long enough. Walking into a home with an oversized air conditioner sometimes feels like you’re walking into a cave: cool, yes, but clammy. An air conditioner actually needs to run long enough for the water vapor in the air to condense on the coils. If it’s two big, it cycles on and off before it can do that.

In fact, on a really hot day, a correctly-sized air conditioner will run almost all the time.

Unfortunately, most air conditioning units are too big for the homes. Why? There are all sorts of reasons. Larger units cost more and so make more for the HVAC company. HVAC companies want to make sure you don’t call them back out because your house is too warm, and so that fudge some oversizing in. And, so on and so forth…

If you’re in the market for a new air conditioner, request that the HVAC company do a “Manual J” and show you their calculations. A Manual J is the industry standard method of determining how much cooling you home will need (both in sensible and latent heat). If they don’t want to do that, then move on to another HVAC company. (Plus, the Manual J already includes a calculation for those really, really hot days.)

The benefits are many. Properly sized units cost less than units that are too large. The home is more comfortable. They cool more efficiently. They need less fan power so there’s an electric and equipment savings there, too.

So, no Manual J, no business. It’s as simple as that.

Common Misconceptions: Insulation Is All You Need

April 27th, 2010 by David Rabenau

Ask most homeowners whose utility bills are high what their homes need, and more likely than not they will reply “insulation”. One of the very first homes I audited was for a elementary school teacher who was a friend. She was going to buy more insulation for her home and thought she’d run the idea by me. I went over to her home and tested it with a blower door, and no amount of insulation was going to bring her utility bills down. It was one of the leakiest homes I’ve measured, still to this day. In other words, it had a lot of air moving through it. What most homeowners don’t realize is that insulation is only one side of the coin. Air sealing is the other. The two combined, an air seal and insulation, is what defines a good thermal barrier in the home, and yet most non-professionals only know about insulation.

A way to illustrate this might be the following example. Let’s say you want to go for a bicycle ride on a somewhat chilly day. Outside temperatures are in the upper 30’s F. If you put on your fleece jacket and hop on your bike, do you think you’re going to stay warm? Doubtful. Why? Because you know that cold air will sail right through that fleece rendering it next to worthless in keeping you warm. Put an outer windproof shell over that fleece and immediately you’ll notice a huge difference. In fact, it’s safe to say that you might quickly find yourself too warm. Not only is fleece (insulation) more or less worthless when air can circulate through it, by comparison it’s not even as important as the shell (the air barrier). If you’re riding that bicycle on a cold winter day and had to choose between a shell (air barrier) and a fleece jacket (insulation), which one would you choose?

Even still, in the building science classes that I teach for up-and-coming BPI home energy auditors, it takes awhile for this to sink in. Invariably when asked what can be done to an example home that is leaky, a couple of hands rise and blurt out “Add insulation”. This notion has been so ingrained in us by the pink, blue or beige insulation companies that it even takes some trained professionals awhile to get it. Oh, and that R-value printed on the insulation package? It was measured when the insulation was enclosed on all six sides in an airtight enclosure.

So the first common building science misconception is that insulation is all you need. While that may be true for a specific home here and there, it is most often incomplete. That insulation must be paired up and side-by-side with a good air barrier. Otherwise, that bike ride is going to be pretty darned cold.

A Tale of Two Cities: Utilities’ Energy Efficiency Programs

April 14th, 2010 by David Rabenau

Not sure why this is a conundrum for some utility companies and not for others. After all, in this case they are both regulated by the same state Public Services Commission. Yet one has had long-standing and vital energy efficiency programs. Kudo’s to the other side of the state!

Program Kansas City Power & Light
(Kansas City, MO)
Ameren UE
(St. Louis, MO)
ENERGY STAR New Homes Program Yes
$800 rebate
$750 for HERS rating
No
Home Performance with ENERGY STAR Program
(Existing Homes)
Yes
Up to $1,200 in bill credits for a HPwES improvement
No
Discounted CFLs Yes Yes
Solar Rebate Yes
$2 watt installed
? – state requirement, but not found on website?
Energy Efficiency HVAC or Heat Pump Yes
Cool Homes Program provides up to $850 rebate
No
Energy Efficient Appliance Rebates Yes
Free programmable thermostat ($300 value)
Yes
Dehumidifier, $25
Freezer, $50
Room A/C, $50

My Take on Local Market Conditions for Home Energy Auditors

April 7th, 2010 by David Rabenau

I get a lot of calls from people asking me about local market conditions for auditors and raters. Green employment is highly desired by many, of course – and even more so when people get laid off from work they didn’t enjoy doing in the first place. It gets them thinking. Some of the calls are from locals, but I get just as many calls nationally. Most of those are former St. Louisians planning on moving back home.

So, I thought I’d write a quick note about our local market conditions for anyone interested. Interested persons might first start, however, with my previous posts about business models, because market conditions have a lot do with whether or not you are going to be a “contractor” or a “consultant”.

Needless to say, these are merely my opinions. I could be right or wrong.

On a macro level, St. Louis has been hit hard by the “Great Recession” just like so many other places. Lay off announcements still appear in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch every week. So, in general, times are tough. There is always some new construction, but it is still greatly diminished. Like elsewhere, there are a lot of construction folk out of business. Thus, even if you are a rater, don’t count on much bread and butter there. There are some custom homes being built “green”, but from my point of view most of that effort is still supply driven, not demand driven. There is a lot of green marketing going on, with all the associated BS which that usually entails.

At that same high level, remember that the St. Louis metro area has some of the lowest utility rates in the nation. This, and the fact that our climate is actually relatively moderate, means that you won’t necessarily be able to rely much on “payback” as a sales tool. There are incentives at the Federal (tax credit) and State (rebates and a tax deduction) levels, and they certainly help; however, those incentives are usually a nice surprise for clients, not a motivator.

There is some auditing business for existing residential. Enough to make ends meet (for me, anyway), although I do know of a lot of auditors who are kept by their day job. They’re ready and waiting, but the business for most just isn’t there. If you’re going to be new in the market and have some savings to scrape by for a fair amount of time, you may do alright. I have always believed that there is always room in a market for really good people. I think that’s still true, even now. But only you can judge yourself in those terms.

What do you need to actually do business as an auditor? Missouri doesn’t license auditors, so have at it. (You may need to get a local business license, though.)

If you want to be on the Missouri Certified Energy Auditor list maintained by the Energy Center of Missouri’s Department of Natural Resources, you need two things: 1) Either be a certified HERS rater or a certified BPI Professional Building Analyst, and 2) insurance. Being on that list qualifies your customers for a Missouri Tax Deduction.

In the St. Louis metro area, if you want to be on the Home Performance with ENERGY STAR (HPwES) list, you need to be both a certified BPI Professional Building Analyst and a certified BPI Envelope Professional. The HPwES program is run by the EarthWays Center of the Missouri Botanical Garden for the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. In my humble opinion, the program is in some disarray. It doesn’t have much funding (it’s never had much funding for market development) and I don’t believe right now it’s running any training classes. Still, it’s a good group of people and worth making the connection. About one-sixth of my existing residential work comes from HPwES referrals off their website.

Having written all this, there are two items on the horizon that may make a huge difference. (Old-timers laugh because there has always seemed to be some great things “on the horizon”, but when oh when will they get here? In other words, in their minds, energy efficiency has more or less always been an industry poised to take off.)

First, there is PACE, or Property Assessed Clean Energy, working its way through the Missouri Legislature. This is a funding mechanism which should help immensely, in that money loaned to a home for energy efficiency or renewable energy improvements is paid off via a property assessment. This means that whoever owns the home at any given time (and who is reaping the operational benefits from energy efficiency or renewable energy) will be paying off the original loan. That’s huge. I, as an individual, will no longer be responsible for paying off the loan, the home will. I, for example, can move to another city with my job, etc. And because payback times are stretched out here in Missouri, that’s a big plus.

Also, the Home Star program making its way through Congress at the Federal level will also help, but mostly if you are a “contractor”, not a “consultant”. When that passes, you may see a lot of contractors move into the market, some of them big. If so, I expect all hell to break loose. $99 energy audits (apparently these are already occurring in S. California). “Little” local firms will be competing eventually with national firms, some of them with tremendous amounts of knowledge and experience in energy efficiency programs.

So there you have it. The market? Not great, not grim, and as always, forever hopeful.

Wrapped Is (Usually) Bad

March 16th, 2010 by David Rabenau

I was walking the insulation aisle of a big home store today when to my dismay I saw wrapped fiberglass insulation is back. This is batt fiberglass insulation that is in a thin perforated plastic sheathing so that the fiberglass is contained in a tube of sorts. It’s supposed to be easier to handle. I’m not so sure about that, but I am sure that this type of insulation is usually bad news.

When I first saw this kind of insulation about seven years back, its maker made the claim that the insulation was safe to install over existing insulation (even though it’s wrapped in plastic, or, one could say, “faced”). They said because of the perforations in the plastic wrapping, it would still allow water vapor to pass through it. It doesn’t. The company (hint: they make pink insulation) isn’t making that claim now – or at least I didn’t see it on the label – but buyer beware! Don’t put this insulation over existing insulation and assume that it will breath. It absolutely simply doesn’t. I know, because I didn’t believe it then. I bought a roll, tore off some of the plastic wrapping (holes and all) and then using the perforated wrap I covered a steaming pot of water. Sure, some of the water vapor probably did escape through the holes, but a lot of it condensed on the underside of the wrapping. (Experiment with this yourself: take some kitchen plastic wrap and punch holes in it, then cover a glass that you just filled half way with steaming water, and watch what happens.) If you use this wrapped insulation, you invite the same potential condensation in your attic.

Demonstration of condensation

And what is “nice” about it, anyway? You really shouldn’t install it without a mask, eye protection, gloves, long sleeve shirt and pants, etc. anyway. At least I wouldn’t. (Once you cut the roll, you’ve exposed the fiberglass, and it’s no longer so “nice”.) Buy the regular unfaced batts instead. They’ll let water vapor through and, besides, they’re cheaper.

To me, this stuff is such a rip-off. I have had clients remove this type of insulation when I’ve found it in their attics over the top of older insulation. The most recent one was a widow, and she didn’t need this kind of headache. For all I know, perhaps her late husband installed it, thinking he was taking good care of their house. So, in addition to paying for the materials and the time (or expense) to have it installed, sorry to say but it now really needs to come out. (Fortunately, one of my recommended insulation contractors was willing to unwrap it for her and re-install the old fiberglass.)

Simply put, it’s not good for the durability of the home: it will allow water vapor to condense, and any water in a home where you don’t want or expect it can be a nasty thing. Think mold or rot. Besides, there are so many other good alternatives (unfaced batts, blown fiberglass, blown cellulose).

And Now For Something Completely Different…

March 9th, 2010 by David Rabenau

This post has nothing to do with energy efficiency or home performance. In honor of the annual migration of Sandhill Crane through Kearney, NE and it environs, which is taking place right now, I’ve posted this essay, ‘Kearney, Nebraska’, for those who might be interested. If you can’t get to Kearney physically, you might try going there virtually via the Rowe Sanctuary’s crane cam (requires Flash).

The Still Misunderstood CFL

February 24th, 2010 by David Rabenau

After having conversations with several clients lately after recommending that they install Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFLs) throughout their homes, I discovered that some good information about CFLs is still not getting out. There seem to be two misconceptions, both having to do with the mercury contained in CFLs.

One complaint was that they contain any mercury at all (compared to incandescent light bulbs). But in the St. Louis area, where most of our electricity is generated by coal-fired plants, its actually a false argument. Let’s say “X” represents the amount of mercury contained in a CFL (which, by the way, has decreased dramatically over the years). Now, knowing that CFLs use less wattage than an incandescent light uses (for the same amount of light), let’s say then that “Y” represents the amount of mercury in the coal that is burned in order to generate the extra energy required to burn an incandescent light. Simply put, “Y” is greater than “X”. In other words, more mercury is released into the atmosphere from the burning of coal for that additional energy that would be required to light an incandescent light bulb (over the amount needed to light a CFL). Furthermore, with CFLs that mercury is contained, not released into the environment from the smokestacks of coal-fired plants.

This leads to the second misunderstanding; namely, that the mercury ends up in landfills when the CFL is thrown away. How good can that be? Well, that’s true… but it needn’t be so. Did you know that Home Depot and many Ace Hardwares in the St. Louis area now recycle burned out CFLs? They need to be put in a plastic bag but, other than that, simply take them to the return counter and drop them off. It’s that easy.

Not A Big Fan of Humidifiers

February 5th, 2010 by David Rabenau

I’m not a big fan of whole house humidifiers.

I have one, myself, in my own home, but it has been turned off for years and I haven’t really noticed the difference. Most humidifiers are sold as a way to make a home more comfortable. True, they can reduce the static electrical shocks one experiences in a (very) dry home. The additional moisture in the air also contains a lot of heat (after all, how did it become suspended in the air?), and that makes the home feel cozier – just as a wet sauna take cozy to the extreme.

But, generally speaking, humidifiers may do more harm than good, especially in homes that are tight — and increasingly more and more homes are being tightened or are being built tight.

When the temperatures in this St. Louis area recently got down in the teens and single digits, I was barraged with calls about window condensation and about water droplets on the ceilings of closets or near an outside wall. Think about it: any time your raise the relative humidity you also raise the dew point. After a certain point it doesn’t take much of a lower temperature to facilitate condensation. Windows, being windows, have limits in their insulating value. If the temperature outside is in the teens or single digits, do you really expect your window panes to stay room temperature? Double-paned windows are a great improvement, but they can only do so much. Likewise, closet doors are often closed and don’t benefit as much from the conditioned air of the home: so they’re colder. Attics and roof structures in most homes were not built with insulating the perimeter in mind, and so the ceilings near the outside walls are usually colder, too.

In fact an argument could be made that the lower the outside temperatures (and therefore the lower the humidity out there), that’s all the more reason to turn off the humidifier. In fact, if you look at most humidifier controls, you set them by the outside temperature and they throttle back the humidity to next to nothing the lower the outside temperature. So what’s the point?

You’re only asking for trouble, because if water is condensing where you can see it, what about where you can’t? Inside your walls maybe? Somewhere underneath that nice blanket of insulation in your attic? And, most horribly, even behind picture frames and mirrors.

And so I get a call, show up at the home and make a beeline to the furnace. What do you think I find? Of course: a humidifier. Invariably.

As I wrote above, this is especially troublesome in tight homes. In a tight home, often the humidity that is generated by the people living in it (respiration), by cooking, washing, and bathing, generates more than enough humidity. In fact, in those homes moisture often still needs to be removed.

So what can you do? If you don’t know how tight your home is, get it tested. It’s that simple. If you’re wedded to your humidifier and you see moisture, then turn it off (or at least way down), especially when the temperatures outside drop. Even then, though, you have to live with the knowledge that you may not know about the condensation you can’t see.

Me? I just turned it off. And, like I wrote, haven’t noticed a difference.

“Energize Missouri – Appliance Rebate Program” Begins April 19

January 25th, 2010 by David Rabenau

Over $5.6 million will be available for rebates that target heating, cooling and water heating systems in Missouri.  The U.S. Department of Energy approved the plan by Missouri Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for a new Energize Missouri Appliance Rebates program to be administered by DNR’s Energy Center. The Energy Center will implement the program using funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

The program will help Missourians buy appliances at lower costs, reduce home utility expenses and benefit Missouri retail businesses. The Energy Center plans to launch the program on April 19, 2010 — at same time as Missouri’s second annual “Show Me Green Energy Star Sales Tax Holiday”.
 
The Energize Missouri Appliance Rebates program will provide Missouri citizens a rebate when they purchase a qualified ENERGY STAR gas furnace, air source heat pump, central air conditioner, clothes washer, dishwasher or one of many qualifying kinds of water heaters, including solar water heating equipment. (Unfortunately, ENERGY STAR refrigerators apparently do not qualify.)
 
Rebates will be for the following items and amounts:
        
Gas Furnaces – $125
Air Source Heat Pumps – $250
Central Air Conditioning – $100
Water Heaters-Gas Condensing- $150
Water Heaters-Gas Storage – $100
Water Heaters-Gas Tankless- $100
Water Heaters-Solar (With Gas Backup) – $500
Water Heaters-Electric Heat Pump- $150
Water Heaters-Solar (With Electric Backup) – $500
Clothes Washers – $75
Dishwashers – $75

Missouri residents should also check with their utility providers for other rebates that may be available for these appliances as well as for other ENERGY STAR appliances not included in Missouri’s program.

Rebates will be made on a first-come, first-served basis and will be discontinued when the rebate fund has been exhausted.
 
To be eligible for rebates purchases must be made after the 2010 starting date of the program, April 19, 2010. For a list of ENERGY STAR qualified appliances and equipment, visit the ENERGY STAR site.

Information and updates on Energize Missouri Appliance Rebates are available at the Energy Center website.