Contact

David Rabenau

314.246.9808

Email

Credentials

David Rabenau is a Certified Missouri Home Energy Auditor

LEED AP logo
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED® AP).
BPI Logo
BPI Certified Professional:
Building Analyst
Envelope

RESNET Rater Seal of Quality
Energy and Environmental Ratings Alliance
Certified HERS Rater

Archive for February, 2010

The Still Misunderstood CFL

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

After having conversations with several clients lately after recommending that they install Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFLs) throughout their homes, I discovered that some good information about CFLs is still not getting out. There seem to be two misconceptions, both having to do with the mercury contained in CFLs.

One complaint was that they contain any mercury at all (compared to incandescent light bulbs). But in the St. Louis area, where most of our electricity is generated by coal-fired plants, its actually a false argument. Let’s say “X” represents the amount of mercury contained in a CFL (which, by the way, has decreased dramatically over the years). Now, knowing that CFLs use less wattage than an incandescent light uses (for the same amount of light), let’s say then that “Y” represents the amount of mercury in the coal that is burned in order to generate the extra energy required to burn an incandescent light. Simply put, “Y” is greater than “X”. In other words, more mercury is released into the atmosphere from the burning of coal for that additional energy that would be required to light an incandescent light bulb (over the amount needed to light a CFL). Furthermore, with CFLs that mercury is contained, not released into the environment from the smokestacks of coal-fired plants.

This leads to the second misunderstanding; namely, that the mercury ends up in landfills when the CFL is thrown away. How good can that be? Well, that’s true… but it needn’t be so. Did you know that Home Depot and many Ace Hardwares in the St. Louis area now recycle burned out CFLs? They need to be put in a plastic bag but, other than that, simply take them to the return counter and drop them off. It’s that easy.

Not A Big Fan of Humidifiers

Friday, February 5th, 2010

I’m not a big fan of whole house humidifiers.

I have one, myself, in my own home, but it has been turned off for years and I haven’t really noticed the difference. Most humidifiers are sold as a way to make a home more comfortable. True, they can reduce the static electrical shocks one experiences in a (very) dry home. The additional moisture in the air also contains a lot of heat (after all, how did it become suspended in the air?), and that makes the home feel cozier – just as a wet sauna take cozy to the extreme.

But, generally speaking, humidifiers may do more harm than good, especially in homes that are tight — and increasingly more and more homes are being tightened or are being built tight.

When the temperatures in this St. Louis area recently got down in the teens and single digits, I was barraged with calls about window condensation and about water droplets on the ceilings of closets or near an outside wall. Think about it: any time your raise the relative humidity you also raise the dew point. After a certain point it doesn’t take much of a lower temperature to facilitate condensation. Windows, being windows, have limits in their insulating value. If the temperature outside is in the teens or single digits, do you really expect your window panes to stay room temperature? Double-paned windows are a great improvement, but they can only do so much. Likewise, closet doors are often closed and don’t benefit as much from the conditioned air of the home: so they’re colder. Attics and roof structures in most homes were not built with insulating the perimeter in mind, and so the ceilings near the outside walls are usually colder, too.

In fact an argument could be made that the lower the outside temperatures (and therefore the lower the humidity out there), that’s all the more reason to turn off the humidifier. In fact, if you look at most humidifier controls, you set them by the outside temperature and they throttle back the humidity to next to nothing the lower the outside temperature. So what’s the point?

You’re only asking for trouble, because if water is condensing where you can see it, what about where you can’t? Inside your walls maybe? Somewhere underneath that nice blanket of insulation in your attic? And, most horribly, even behind picture frames and mirrors.

And so I get a call, show up at the home and make a beeline to the furnace. What do you think I find? Of course: a humidifier. Invariably.

As I wrote above, this is especially troublesome in tight homes. In a tight home, often the humidity that is generated by the people living in it (respiration), by cooking, washing, and bathing, generates more than enough humidity. In fact, in those homes moisture often still needs to be removed.

So what can you do? If you don’t know how tight your home is, get it tested. It’s that simple. If you’re wedded to your humidifier and you see moisture, then turn it off (or at least way down), especially when the temperatures outside drop. Even then, though, you have to live with the knowledge that you may not know about the condensation you can’t see.

Me? I just turned it off. And, like I wrote, haven’t noticed a difference.