Contact

David Rabenau

314.246.9808

Email

Credentials

David Rabenau is a Certified Missouri Home Energy Auditor

LEED AP logo
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED® AP).
BPI Logo
BPI Certified Professional:
Building Analyst
Envelope

RESNET Rater Seal of Quality
Energy and Environmental Ratings Alliance
Certified HERS Rater

Archive for the ‘Building Science’ Category

Common Misconceptions: Window BS

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Window Building Science or just plain window BS? You decide. A lot of home energy auditors feel that windows are over-sold, meaning that the typical window salesman exaggerates the benefits of new windows. Let’s run some numbers and you can decide, because in truth, like most things in building science, it all depends on the specifics.

For our example, we are going to use a 36” x 60” window, or 15 square feet. We’re also going to assume that our example home has an 80 AFUE natural gas furnace, meaning roughly that it runs at 80% efficiency. The home also has an air conditioning unit for cooling with an efficiency of 13 SEER, the federal minimum standard. The 80 AFUE furnace is probably about average and the 13 SEER A/C is probably a little better than most installed units. (Those homeowners in rural areas who have electric heat are going to have heating savings substantially higher than what we calculate below.) Further, we’re going to pretend this house is in St. Louis, Missouri (so it has 4900 HDD and 1527 CDD). So now we’re ready to go.

Let’s say we have an old single glazed wood frame window and we purchase a brand new ENERGY STAR replacement window for it. Uninstalled we could expect to pay about $109 for the new window. Remember, that’s uninstalled. Given the assumptions we made above, we can expect to save about $9.92 in heating costs and about $16.36 in cooling costs annually. In other words, that may not be a bad investment, especially if the windows are leaky and the installation cost wasn’t too exorbitant. By “leaky” here I mean air leakage since if they leaked water they’d probably have been replaced long ago – or should have been.

But most of us don’t have old single glazing type windows alone. They probably had storm windows added to them a long time ago, and that presents a completely different scenario. Replacing a single glazed window that has a storm window with a new ENERGY STAR replacement window (same price), we might expect to save only $3.14 in heating costs and $5.18 in cooling costs annually. It’s going to take some time then to pay off that new window. Now, if this is the meager savings I get with a single glazed window with a storm, you can pretty much assume that if you have an old double-glazed window which a window salesman is trying to get you to replace, that your savings wouldn’t be any better.

Ok, ok – let’s say we did have an old single glazed window without a storm. It would cost us about $46.00 to purchase a storm window for it (uninstalled again). Once installed we could expect it to save us $6.78 in heating costs and $11.18 in cooling costs annually. Wow! But, true, there is the hassle of putting them up and taking them down each year if you are so inclined to do so.

So that’s window building science in a nutshell. Given the savings above, it’s probably better to spend the window money for energy efficiency upgrades elsewhere in the home. But not always. There are some situations where new windows is a very good investment.

And finally, for those of you engineering types who just can’t put your pencils down, I’m using $1 for the cost of a natural gas therm and $0.086 for the cost of kWh (read this and weep, Californians). The U-values used for the window examples above are:

.9 – Single glazed wood frame

.3 – ENERGY STAR qualified window

.49 – Single glazed with storm window

That should be all you need to check my calculations.

Wrapped Is (Usually) Bad

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

I was walking the insulation aisle of a big home store today when to my dismay I saw wrapped fiberglass insulation is back. This is batt fiberglass insulation that is in a thin perforated plastic sheathing so that the fiberglass is contained in a tube of sorts. It’s supposed to be easier to handle. I’m not so sure about that, but I am sure that this type of insulation is usually bad news.

When I first saw this kind of insulation about seven years back, its maker made the claim that the insulation was safe to install over existing insulation (even though it’s wrapped in plastic, or, one could say, “faced”). They said because of the perforations in the plastic wrapping, it would still allow water vapor to pass through it. It doesn’t. The company (hint: they make pink insulation) isn’t making that claim now – or at least I didn’t see it on the label – but buyer beware! Don’t put this insulation over existing insulation and assume that it will breath. It absolutely simply doesn’t. I know, because I didn’t believe it then. I bought a roll, tore off some of the plastic wrapping (holes and all) and then using the perforated wrap I covered a steaming pot of water. Sure, some of the water vapor probably did escape through the holes, but a lot of it condensed on the underside of the wrapping. (Experiment with this yourself: take some kitchen plastic wrap and punch holes in it, then cover a glass that you just filled half way with steaming water, and watch what happens.) If you use this wrapped insulation, you invite the same potential condensation in your attic.

Demonstration of condensation

And what is “nice” about it, anyway? You really shouldn’t install it without a mask, eye protection, gloves, long sleeve shirt and pants, etc. anyway. At least I wouldn’t. (Once you cut the roll, you’ve exposed the fiberglass, and it’s no longer so “nice”.) Buy the regular unfaced batts instead. They’ll let water vapor through and, besides, they’re cheaper.

To me, this stuff is such a rip-off. I have had clients remove this type of insulation when I’ve found it in their attics over the top of older insulation. The most recent one was a widow, and she didn’t need this kind of headache. For all I know, perhaps her late husband installed it, thinking he was taking good care of their house. So, in addition to paying for the materials and the time (or expense) to have it installed, sorry to say but it now really needs to come out. (Fortunately, one of my recommended insulation contractors was willing to unwrap it for her and re-install the old fiberglass.)

Simply put, it’s not good for the durability of the home: it will allow water vapor to condense, and any water in a home where you don’t want or expect it can be a nasty thing. Think mold or rot. Besides, there are so many other good alternatives (unfaced batts, blown fiberglass, blown cellulose).

Not A Big Fan of Humidifiers

Friday, February 5th, 2010

I’m not a big fan of whole house humidifiers.

I have one, myself, in my own home, but it has been turned off for years and I haven’t really noticed the difference. Most humidifiers are sold as a way to make a home more comfortable. True, they can reduce the static electrical shocks one experiences in a (very) dry home. The additional moisture in the air also contains a lot of heat (after all, how did it become suspended in the air?), and that makes the home feel cozier – just as a wet sauna take cozy to the extreme.

But, generally speaking, humidifiers may do more harm than good, especially in homes that are tight — and increasingly more and more homes are being tightened or are being built tight.

When the temperatures in this St. Louis area recently got down in the teens and single digits, I was barraged with calls about window condensation and about water droplets on the ceilings of closets or near an outside wall. Think about it: any time your raise the relative humidity you also raise the dew point. After a certain point it doesn’t take much of a lower temperature to facilitate condensation. Windows, being windows, have limits in their insulating value. If the temperature outside is in the teens or single digits, do you really expect your window panes to stay room temperature? Double-paned windows are a great improvement, but they can only do so much. Likewise, closet doors are often closed and don’t benefit as much from the conditioned air of the home: so they’re colder. Attics and roof structures in most homes were not built with insulating the perimeter in mind, and so the ceilings near the outside walls are usually colder, too.

In fact an argument could be made that the lower the outside temperatures (and therefore the lower the humidity out there), that’s all the more reason to turn off the humidifier. In fact, if you look at most humidifier controls, you set them by the outside temperature and they throttle back the humidity to next to nothing the lower the outside temperature. So what’s the point?

You’re only asking for trouble, because if water is condensing where you can see it, what about where you can’t? Inside your walls maybe? Somewhere underneath that nice blanket of insulation in your attic? And, most horribly, even behind picture frames and mirrors.

And so I get a call, show up at the home and make a beeline to the furnace. What do you think I find? Of course: a humidifier. Invariably.

As I wrote above, this is especially troublesome in tight homes. In a tight home, often the humidity that is generated by the people living in it (respiration), by cooking, washing, and bathing, generates more than enough humidity. In fact, in those homes moisture often still needs to be removed.

So what can you do? If you don’t know how tight your home is, get it tested. It’s that simple. If you’re wedded to your humidifier and you see moisture, then turn it off (or at least way down), especially when the temperatures outside drop. Even then, though, you have to live with the knowledge that you may not know about the condensation you can’t see.

Me? I just turned it off. And, like I wrote, haven’t noticed a difference.

3 “Different” Books for the Auditor

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

These three books are only “different” in the sense that you won’t see them on a typical booklist for the residential energy professional. Yet they’re three of my most valued books, and I find myself referring to at least one of them on a weekly basis.

Warning, though: You have to like buildings to like these books. If you like everything about buildings, construction, and building science, you’ll love these books.

#1 – How Buildings Learn: What happens after they’re built by Stewart Brand (Penguin Books, 1994). A popular architecture book by the creator of The Whole Earth Catalog, this book is a work of genius in its depth of thought and awareness of what buildings try to tell us. If nothing else, this book will change the way you look at a every new home you meet, providing you a kind of detailed and philosophical framework that I think is necessary for excellent building analysis. It is easily the best book on buildings, their architecture, their use, and their interaction in the larger scheme of their environment, that I have ever read.

#2 – Renovation 3rd Edition by Michael W. Litchfield (The Taunton Press, 2005). Thoroughly updated, this book is an absolutely great reference for any kind of renovation or remodeling work in virtually any home you’ll encounter. While I use it as a reference, it would probably also serve as a primer to those new to construction, particularly in helping the auditor know what’s possible and in helping to write specifications. Here is its chapter list:

  • Inspecting a House
  • Planning
  • Tools
  • Building Materials
  • Roofs
  • Doors, Windows, and Skylights
  • Exteriors
  • Structural Carpentry
  • Masonry
  • Foundations and Concrete
  • Electrical Wiring
  • Plumbing
  • Kitchens and Baths
  • Energy Conservation and Air Quality
  • Finish Surfaces
  • Tiling
  • Finish Carpentry
  • Painting
  • Wallpapering
  • Flooring

#3 – All About Old Buildings: The Whole Preservation Catalog by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, edited by Diane Maddex (The Preservation Press, 1985). Unfortunately, this book is out of print, but it can be found in many libraries, and used copies still purchased at online booksellers (and quite cheaply too). Some of its entries are also out of date, but the book is full of great photos, stories and resources. Whenever I wonder if there is a resource for this or that, this is the second place I turn (after doing an online search). The book is a The Whole Earth Catalog for buildings, construction, and preservation.